Most Puerto Ricans realize specific translation of one’s Religious lifestyle. Given Christianity’s stance for the homosexuality while the a sinful lifetime, this is simply not alarming to locate a robust bad organization anywhere between religiosity and intimate bias (Diaz, 1998; Company, 1995). Additionally, we asked if or not religiosity you are going to boost intimate bias by broadening participants‘ ethical opposition to interact that have gay somebody and/otherwise perceive one connections which have homosexual folks once the positive. However, a structural model having religiosity anticipating sexual prejudice together with the almost every other analysis variables are seen to be unreliable and you can unpredictable. Hence, we really do not faith religiosity ‚s the operating grounds for all most other investigation parameters. When you’re an input to decrease individuals‘ religiosity is unethical, we would highly recommend discover talks of Christianity’s posture towards the intimate direction instead of gay behaviors inside religious setup (Wager, Serafini, Rabkin, Remien, & Williams, 1994). This type of points will get remove Puerto Rican’s negative thinking towards homosexual men and you can lady by detatching the main focus away from stigma regarding the homosexual individual in order to a particular intimate decisions.
Eventually, we discover zero intercourse variations in new connections between intimate prejudice and studies variables. Nonetheless, the absence of sex difference could be due to our very own Adventure dating apps measurement of sexual prejudice. The distinctions when you look at the goods blogs in our ATL and you can ATG subscales generate direct reviews among them subscales unfeasible. Prior studies interested in intercourse variations in thinking into homosexuality adjusted the fresh new ATLG goods wording to be similar apart from the reference classification (i.e., “[Male/Female] homosexuality is good perversion.”) (Herek, 2002a). Alternatively, even the differences in intimate bias for our study population try perhaps not on account of a sex dichotomy however, so you can distinctions round the sex spots (Sakalli, 2002). People which have deeper salience when you look at the machismo plus its thinking from manliness is promote better sexual bias certainly one of men (Cunningham, 1998). Coming look is always to explore exactly how items wording, social beliefs, and you can intercourse distinctions ong Puerto Ricans.
Our study has several limitations. Very first, brand new study’s get across-sectional data minimal the company temporal ordering your variables. Future lookup will be speak about this new causal relationship involving the studies parameters. Second, economic and you may funding constraints reduced all of our power to collect a much bigger sample. A much bigger attempt which might be split for the random halves can get allow for a lot more modifications is produced using one half of the latest take to, if you find yourself investigations new fully-changed model on the almost every other haphazard 1 / 2 of. Third, studies results may be non-generalizable to own Puerto Rican non-university communities. Even though users featured motivated to take part in the study, earlier lookup found people with low academic attainment will score large towards the sexual bias (Herek, 2002). Next, i did not figure out if players interacted with gay guys or lesbians who worry about-revealed its intimate direction or if they believed males and you will people have been homosexuals. 5th, our inability to evaluate the number of students missing inside for each and every classroom for the survey limits the latest analysis from prospective exposure biases. Still, as data collection happened at the beginning of the new session, we feel the possibilities of dropouts and you may students perhaps not browsing lecture have reduced. Finally, religiosity’s impact on sexual prejudice is definitely worth greater exploration. The studies are not able to assemble information on participants‘ spiritual affiliations. Considering the diversity of Christian life style (85% Roman Catholic and you may fifteen% Protestant and other; CIA Industry Factbook (2005)), future training will be explore whether or not religiosity’s effect on intimate bias may vary because of the religious lifestyle.